National infrastructure intelligence command

See where the market is moving.
Know who is moving it.

Connected intelligence across data centers, power generation, and industrial megasites—built for construction opportunity discovery.

Explore the relationship network →

America / New York

Sourced project library

Track the infrastructure stack

Project totals match the sourced library. Select an asset class to explore its projects and supporting signals.

Entity lens

Follow the project team

0projects in view

ACTIVE INTELLIGENCE LENS

No company filters — national signal view

Company filters match explicit mentions in source metadata. Trade-intelligence scores measure confidence in the named relationship and role—not proof of a downstream subcontract award. Every scored trade lead links to its evidence.

Opportunity radar

United States signal map

HighEmergingSignal

LOCATION POLICY Markers require explicit geographic evidence in source metadata.

Prospecting board

Actionable opportunity queue

Signal	Market	Project team + trade intelligence	Budget range	Est. completion	Evidence	Action

Showing 0 of 0 records

Strategic watchlist

What the filtered market is telling us

Scoring methodology

Opportunity score: Each distinct, source-backed research project record counts once. Construction, phased buildout and active expansion carry 1 point; advanced development, preconstruction and limited notice to proceed carry 0.75; development, approvals, conditional financing and solicitations carry 0.5; announcements, early planning, commissioning and ramp carry 0.25. Completed, operating-only, historical, cancelled and unknown stages add no points. Articles, social mentions and unverified signals add no points.

Curved scale: Score = 100 × weighted points ÷ (weighted points + 4), rounded and capped at 99. Four construction-equivalent records score 50; sixteen score 80; thirty-six score 90. The curve rewards established pipelines while keeping room for growth. Every state and filter uses the same scale. Map colors are high at 80+, emerging at 50–79, and lower activity below 50. Tied watchlist scores sort by unrounded activity, then state name.

What it measures: Documented construction activity in this library, not win probability, remaining spend or a complete market census. Project records can represent campuses, phases or programs. Scores use recorded status; they do not infer freshness, size or delivery certainty from budgets or estimated completion dates.

Trade intelligence: 90–100 is confirmed by a primary or government source; 70–89 is probable from a named project participant or corroborated delivery role; 50–69 is a credible hypothesis. Scores judge evidence for the relationship and role—not proof of a subcontract award.

Budget + schedule: Reported values anchor high-confidence ranges. Other ranges are modeled from capacity, asset class, status, and project complexity. Hover table values for the assessment basis; all estimates are planning intelligence, not bids or owner commitments.